Strike 3 Holdings cases on both coasts.
Read moreBodyguard Productions files more suits in Utah
Bodyguard Productions files a handful of new cases in Utah.
Read moreAn incredible May and June for Strike 3 Holdings filings
Strike 3 Holdings has filed a slew of new cases across the United States. Updates and links to help are here.
Read moreBodyguard Productions continues filing
Bodyguard Productions files three new multiple-Doe suits filed in the District of Utah.
Read moreStrike 3 continues filings with new cases in New York and Florida
Strike 3 Holdings files a slew of New York Cases (Southern and Northern Districts) as well as Middle District of Florida cases.
Read moreLess active BitTorrent Plaintiffs still filing in Hawaii
Two new cases in the District of Hawaii
Read moreNew Strike 3 Holdings cases in Florida, California, Michigan, and New York
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has filed a large amount of cases in the past week. The cases, filed at the end of March and early April, follow. If you are a defendant in one of these cases, do not ignore it. Contact Jonathan for a free consultation and flat-rate payment plans to protect yourself.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Eastern District of New York): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 108.244.201.192, (Southern District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.196.188.17, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.199.238.60, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.199.239.139, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 47.199.247.145, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 70.126.192.176, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 71.196.28.167, (Southern District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 72.189.105.165, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. JOHN DOE subscriber assigned IP address 97.101.173.205, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-04-01
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP ) Address 68.55.161.203, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 108.223.199.122, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 108.224.53.206, (Western District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 24.192.222.117, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 50.4.214.213, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.42.215.111, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.60.33.52, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.62.41.27, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 68.84.189.69, (Western District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 69.14.118.42, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 69.14.151.202, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 70.243.160.150, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 71.227.57.71, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 73.161.104.236, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 73.161.221.162, (Western District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 73.8.199.160, (Western District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 96.27.30.125, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP Address 96.35.96.170, (Eastern District of Michigan): filed 2019-03-28
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.178.8.55, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 104.35.130.0, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 107.185.81.77, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 108.77.136.43, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 162.226.174.212, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 184.88.88.93, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 23.242.84.230, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.24.128.33, (Central District of California): filed 2019-03-27
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.4.36.83, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.5.84.18, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 67.169.118.235, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.162.244.17, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.112.121, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.255.94, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.189.63.136, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.202.244.50, (Northern District of California): filed 2019-03-29
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 99.101.168.108, (Middle District of Florida): filed 2019-03-29
Despite Hawaiian pushback, Bodyguard Productions files new suit
The District of Hawaii has pushed back on Bodyguard Production suits. Even so, Bodyguard continues. It recently continued n the District of Hawaii, having named the defendant. Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Musante.
New Strike 3 Holdings cases
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC has filed a number of new cases in Connecticut and New York. The new case numbers and filing dates are below. If you received a subpoena or summons related to one of these cases, Jonathan can help.
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (District of Connecticut): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Eastern District of New York): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Eastern District of New York): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Eastern District of New York): filed 2019-03-13
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Western District of New York): filed 2019-03-18
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Western District of New York): filed 2019-03-18
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Western District of New York): filed 2019-03-18
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe, (Western District of New York): filed 2019-03-18
Strike 3 Holdings is a known BitTorrent Plaintiff that Jonathan Phillips has extensive experience with.
If you want to learn more about Strike 3 Holdings and BitTorrent cases, click here.
Supreme Court case to affect BitTorrent suits?
Did you get sued for an unregistered copyright? The Supreme Court has an issue with that.
Read moreIs viability of the Motion to Quash increasing?
Is Connecticut ripe for Motions to Quash to succeed?
Read moreHawaiian Courts not keen on attorneys' fees awards
District Court of Hawaii awards only one hour of time for recycled filings.
Read moreIP Addresses are not people - Ninth Circuit
Brief comments on last fall’s Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in Cobbler Nevada v. Gonzales
Read moreAttorneys' fees in the Northern District for BitTorrent defendants?
I have defended legions of individuals accused of copyright infringement through use of BitTorrent. As Professor Sag points out, the Northern District of Illinois is a hot-spot for BitTorrent litigation. Unsurprisingly, Jonathan has defended many BitTorrent defendants there, including his client in case number 13-6312. In that case, Jonathan defeated Malibu Media at summary judgment.
Recently, Judge Dow of the Northern District of Illinois denied a prevailing defendant’s request for attorneys fees. There is, however, a silver lining to his opinion.
However, the points advanced by Defendant about the potential for abuse across the universe of peer-to-peer copyright infringement cases convince the Court that it should re-evaluate its own overall treatment of these cases and consider whether to suggest that the Rules Committee in this district look into the matter as well.
Presumably, these rule changes will make the Northern District of Illinois less friendly to BitTorrent Plaintiffs. However, the mandatory initial discovery pilot program and changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure did not slow the filing of these cases in the Northern District of Illinois.